Mitsubishi Prototype X Breaks Cover

From Ferrari's to Fiats, it happens in here.

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

oodLes
Mechanic
Posts: 661
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:00 pm

Mitsubishi Prototype X Breaks Cover

Post by oodLes »

Source
Mitsubishi has revealed the Prototype X, a concept version of the 2008 Lancer Evolution X. The car was first previewed with the Concept X in 2005, and is now based on the production-ready 2008 Lancer sedan.

Power comes from a 2.0-liter turbocharged four cylinder engine with over 300 horsepower. A choice of a 5-speed manual or sequential-manual gearbox will be offered. Power will make it to the ground via a S-AWC (Super All-Wheel Control) system, featuring active steering and electronic yaw control.

Mitsubishi says the advanced technology represents the "largest leap in overall capability between two generations of the Evolution."
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

I highly doubt that this car will be any different to the released one, with the interior being fully finished.
It looks every bit as good as I had hoped.
mxysxy
Oldtimer
Posts: 1905
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by mxysxy »

ugly as,
what with mitsu design team?
User avatar
jonowong
Oldtimer
Posts: 3420
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by jonowong »

reminds me of the commodore
User avatar
Nacho
Oldtimer
Posts: 2087
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Nacho »

Active steering? Hmmmm.... :?

Anyone know what that is? It sounds interesting.......
You never get a second chance to make a first impression.
kid_dynamite
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 836
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: sydney

Post by kid_dynamite »

Say goodbye to the 4G63 in this car too. Running an all-aluminium '4B11' engine that's apparently 20kg lighter than its predecessor.

The front styling is quite agressive, almost R34 like... :D
FTO-101
Grease Monkey
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: SyDnEy...ClUb

Post by FTO-101 »

I think that looks awesome thats the new evo X it's in the latest issue of motor magazine and has 225Kw instead of 206Kw from the evo IX
noccers
Grease Monkey
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wantirna South, Melbourne
Contact:

Post by noccers »

ugly car, nice interior finish.

why would the tyres say exhibition use only on them :s that's odd.. if you take them on the road they explode? :lol:
gawk; talk; date; wine; grep; touch; unzip; strip; touch; gasp; finger; gasp; mount; fsck; more; yes; fsck; gasp; eject; umount; make clean; make mrproper; sleep;

successful trades: d_stroy_r, shue, mxysxy, dstocks
User avatar
Nacho
Oldtimer
Posts: 2087
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Nacho »

The headlamps look really nice. At least it kinda doesn't look like a lancer anymore. :wink:
You never get a second chance to make a first impression.
User avatar
FTO338
Oldtimer
Posts: 6712
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Port Melbourne: Pimping with RX400h, B200 Turbo.

Post by FTO338 »

Nacho wrote:The headlamps look really nice. At least it kinda doesn't look like a lancer anymore. :wink:
Bad news for you Joel, the new Lancer look like that too :lol: have you ever thought about that EVO are Lancer base, so they will always looks similar.

Apparently they are bringing out a cheap version of EVO ($45k) by using the current 4G63 Mivec engine, instead of the 4B11 Mivec. So looks like there's going to be lots of rice rockets by 2008, and that won't be healthy for those current EVO owner resell value either, as expected value of an imported EVO7-8 could go for under $20k by 2008.

Anyway few more pics, like KD said the front looks like R34 Sky.line and I say the back looks like Alfa.

Image
Image
DISCLAIMER: The above text is the personal opinion of the author and does not represent the indisputable truth. The author is not responsible for any deaths, injuries or mental illness caused by the above statments.
Sparhawk
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1184
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Wagga

Post by Sparhawk »

All down to personal choice of course, but I very much like the new look. When some of the kids leave home, might have to trade in the Pajero for one... :wink:
[color=blue]Death is life's way of telling you - you're fired.[/color]
Oh Bugger, my sig block pic has dropped off the host ;(
User avatar
BorepYano
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by BorepYano »

ROFL

dont think less of me for this, but when i saw the pics, the first thing i thought of was:

gee that car looks sad/angry.

the front end looks like a pouty face lol.

and the rear looks mazda-ish

my 2c :)
User avatar
mr-charisma
Oldtimer
Posts: 4020
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by mr-charisma »

BorepYano wrote:ROFL

dont think less of me for this, but when i saw the pics, the first thing i thought of was:

gee that car looks sad/angry.

the front end looks like a pouty face lol.

and the rear looks mazda-ish

my 2c :)
lol, it does look angry :P and yeah, i had that same impression of the back looking like a mazda..
User avatar
nosman
Grease Monkey
Posts: 331
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Port Macquarie, NSW

Post by nosman »

Looks abit like an Accord Euro from the side too :o
kid_dynamite
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 836
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: sydney

Post by kid_dynamite »

Image

This is the final production version of the X. Quite similar to the prototype pics.

Rest of them here:
http://www.motorauthority.com/news/seda ... volution-x
User avatar
FTO338
Oldtimer
Posts: 6712
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Port Melbourne: Pimping with RX400h, B200 Turbo.

Post by FTO338 »

The wheels on the prototype is much better...
DISCLAIMER: The above text is the personal opinion of the author and does not represent the indisputable truth. The author is not responsible for any deaths, injuries or mental illness caused by the above statments.
User avatar
boarsai
Mechanic
Posts: 566
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 6:00 pm
Location: Brisbane <-> Sunshine Coast
Contact:

Post by boarsai »

FTO338 wrote:The wheels on the prototype is much better...
Easily fixed.

Interesting look... and it does look like 3 styles combined... not a fan of how that grill works/looks... but I'm sure a kit'd fix that :D

Could have been worse :lol:

I'd hit it.
User avatar
DunK
Apprentice
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by DunK »

FTO338 wrote:The wheels on the prototype is much better...
agreed, it looks crap with the final one -_-"...

as everyone said...the interior is alrite part from the console...and fuk the exterior is just disgusting.
User avatar
SchumieFan
Oldtimer
Posts: 5875
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: GPS signal lost
Contact:

Post by SchumieFan »

ugly as a dog on heat,

i thin ki prefer the actual lancer look to the EVO look... i dont like the side profile of the front AT ALL, there will be plenty of those things getting dinged.

i wish they'd go design a rallye car and then adapt it for the road... like the E4

sad its still only a 2L... for the looks you have to say its just sad
Image
User avatar
BorepYano
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by BorepYano »

SchumieFan wrote:...
sad its still only a 2L...
they have to keep it at 2L so they can keep racing it in the rallies.

and the car looks angry... not scary enough to be angry... more... grumpy lol
kiz wrote:
silverGPX wrote:This requires a thread? lol
There's potential for a thread about anything on FTO Australia
EURO
Oldtimer
Posts: 1346
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by EURO »

im not sure on it yet - but think it looks a lot better then there last few efforts which have looked boring and outdated. At least this looks is trying to be a bit more aggressive. Need to see it in the flesh though.
Post Reply