Mitsubishi Lancer EVO X MR

[Oliver89]

General specifications
Record last updated 05 / 02 / 2007
Country of origin Japan
Numbers built N/A
Year of introduction 2007
Engine
Engine 4B11 T/C Straight 4
Engine Location Front , transversely mounted
Configuration aluminum block and head
Displacement 1.998 liter / 121.9 cu in
Bore / Stroke 86.0 mm (3.4 in) / 86.0 mm (3.4 in)
Compression ratio 9.0:1
Valvetrain 4 valves / cylinder, DOHC
Fuel feed Fuel injection
Aspiration Turbo
Drivetrain
Chassis/body unitary steel
Front suspension McPherson struts, Eibach coil springs, Bilstein monotube dampers, anti-roll bar
Rear suspension Multi-link, forged aluminum control arms, Eibach coil springs, Bilstein shock absorbers
Steering rack-and-pinion, power assisted
Brakes Brembo vented discs, all-round, ABS
Gearbox 6 speed Automatic
Drive All wheel drive
Dimensions
Weight 1540 kilo / 3395.1 lbs
Length / Width / Height 4495 mm (177 in) / 1810 mm (71.3 in) / 1480 mm (58.3 in)
Wheelbase / Track (fr/r) 2650 mm (104.3 in) / 1545 mm (60.8 in) / 1545 mm (60.8 in)
Performance figures
Power 295 bhp / 220 KW @ 6500 rpm
Torque 407 Nm / 300 ft lbs @ 4400 rpm
BHP/Liter 148 bhp / liter
Power to weight ratio 0.19 bhp / kg

what do you guy's think about this car ?

Im totally in Love.

[RallyMad]

I thought the MR wasn't due to be released until some time later this year?

But agreed, sounds awesome

[JOeJOe]

6 speed auto

[Delvance]

Interesting...heh 220kw to combat the new Sti. Maybe they're not so dumb after all. Sounds nice, if they can make it look a bit more aggressive and flavour the rear end a bit more...it'd be close to perfect for me heh.

[fto617]

er....i dont think the MR is goign to be released in australia.

to be honest...i think the evo x is lazy in the SST
i have driven it last year on wakefield and feels sh*t
the power is lazy, the steering is good though, but gearchanges.....sucks ass....overheat on the THIRD LAP at wakefield !!!

IMO, the new evo x is too heavy, lack in power and DONT BUY AUTO
havent driven the manual version though
and yes/....SST is automatic twin clutch gear changes suppose to be fast, but manual is always better for fun!!!

[SG]

they did a full review of the evo X on a Best Motoring episode i watched the other day... i couldnt really understand what they said but the rough results were....

sst in normal mode did a ~14.3 1/4 mile
sst in sport mode did a ~14.0 1/4 mile
sst in s-sport mode did a ~13.7 1/4 mile
5mt transmission did a ~14.0

on a tight test track the i cant remember if hte sst was faster than the 5mt, i think the 5mt was a bit faster. for that test they had ASC turned off and SAWC turned on..because that seemed to be the fastest combination. (they tryed them all aswell)

and at the end on their big circuit they had a race between a evo 9, and evo 10 (sst), an evo 10 (5mt), the last generation subie, and a g35(?) s k y l i n e

fastest lap times for that was:
evo9
subaru
evo10 5mt
evo10 sst (i think he had the transmission overheat)
g35 (he lost by miles)


1540 kilos is just too much i reckon