6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

This forum is for technical discussions on anything that will make your car handle better or go faster.

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

MH999
Mechanic
Posts: 408
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:00 pm
Location: perth wa
Contact:

6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by MH999 »

Gday i have very limited mechanical knowledge but back when i had my tf gemini i remember it had a 2ltr rodeo engine block with a 1600 gemini cylinder head for high compression and it went like a mother f%c:er.So iam just wondering with these mitsubishis is it possible to get 6a12 mivec heads onto a 6a13 (2.5)na block,,has it been done and would it go like a mother f?c*er just curious i did a search and couldnt find anything.
User avatar
Valandis91
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Tasmania
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by Valandis91 »

look up frankenstein engine from RPW. they started building one but no one was prepared to put up the dosh. i was going to until i realised with that high compression constant rebuilds and so forth not worth it. Its like $10,000 just for the block and heads. without cams etc... not cheap thats for sure
Image
User avatar
aza013
NSW Coordinator
Posts: 9087
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: The Shire
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by aza013 »

Yes it can be done as the 6A13 block is the same as the 6A12 but it has been opened up to a 2.5L.
You just need to match the heads to the 2.5 and some other small things but sould be a smooth transfer.
User avatar
Dan25
Mechanic
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by Dan25 »

Can I just point out that above are two extremely contradictory answers...

I dunno about the OP, but I'm sure as hell confused :?

This isn't meant to come across as a criticism of either of you, but I'm genuinely interested in knowing who's answer is more accurate...
User avatar
vipfto
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4154
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by vipfto »

without details yes it can be done but it will cost lots. not as simple as as just whacking on the 6a12 heads and be done with it. Just like whack in a 6a13tt and she will be right
FTO GR-TURBO
172KW ATW @ 11PSI
User avatar
I8A4RE
QLD Coordinator
Posts: 9594
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: BOOSTIN in front of you
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by I8A4RE »

Dan25 wrote:Can I just point out that above are two extremely contradictory answers...

I dunno about the OP, but I'm sure as hell confused :?

This isn't meant to come across as a criticism of either of you, but I'm genuinely interested in knowing who's answer is more accurate...
How are they contradictory? They are both saying it can be done. They are both accurate in their own right.

If your talking about cost, then cost will always be different from one person to the next as some know people in the trade or will do some things themselves or will just get more work done instead of just the bare minimum.
CHRISTIANITY: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
User avatar
Dan25
Mechanic
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by Dan25 »

You just need to match the heads to the 2.5 and some other small things but sould be a smooth transfer.
This makes it sound easy...

...Easy generally implies few complications and subsequently low cost (less labour, f**king around with parts etc.) At least this is what I believe can be reasonably inferred from that...
they started building one but no one was prepared to put up the dosh. i was going to until i realised with that high compression constant rebuilds and so forth not worth it. Its like $10,000 just for the block and heads. without cams etc... not cheap thats for sure
That makes it sound expensive and complicated... not easy.

I guess that was my point. I know they both said it could be done.

Anyway, let's not get bogged down with interpretations and what-not.

I was just simply curious.
User avatar
aza013
NSW Coordinator
Posts: 9087
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: The Shire
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by aza013 »

Well you have to stop and think RPW was trying to make a monster of a motor, that's why the cost is so high.
To do just a normal mix and match would at most be $5000approx may even be less.
It just comes down to what you want done to it as posted befor.
I have started looking into this about 6 months ago as it's one thing I am looking to do after I max out the 6A12NA.
User avatar
aza013
NSW Coordinator
Posts: 9087
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: The Shire
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by aza013 »

Some thing to have a read of :D
http://www.mogwa.org/forum/phpBB2/viewt ... 3506426670

I will add another link soon with more info.

Ok a link to the RPW setup.
http://www.rpw.com.au/shop/index.php?op ... &Itemid=40
User avatar
Bennoz
National President
Posts: 23668
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by Bennoz »

Everything at RPW ends up costing a fortune :roll:

Aka, FtoSams unfinished, troublesome, RPW engine supplied, turbo FTO.
User avatar
Dan25
Mechanic
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by Dan25 »

aza013 wrote:Ok a link to the RPW setup.
http://www.rpw.com.au/shop/index.php?op ... &Itemid=40
Ok, that turns me off that idea 8O
User avatar
Valandis91
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Tasmania
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by Valandis91 »

aza013 wrote:Well you have to stop and think RPW was trying to make a monster of a motor, that's why the cost is so high.
To do just a normal mix and match would at most be $5000approx may even be less.
It just comes down to what you want done to it as posted befor.
I have started looking into this about 6 months ago as it's one thing I am looking to do after I max out the 6A12NA.
$5000? that seems too cheap... what does that involve? mine is pretty much set up for it. i might do this when my bottem end goes in the future then. was the forged pistons necessary as well?

i would love to have the top end i have with some decent low down torque.
Bennoz wrote:Everything at RPW ends up costing a fortune :roll:

Aka, FtoSams unfinished, troublesome, RPW engine supplied, turbo FTO.
haha i second this. RPW is VERY expensive. but its the only place you can get parts unless you go custom which i couldnt do with much faith cos i live on the bottom of the earth. aka hobart.
Image
User avatar
aza013
NSW Coordinator
Posts: 9087
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: The Shire
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by aza013 »

The $5000 is just a ball park figer.
As for the forged stuff you should not need them unless you are going to go hard core turbo.
I would just use the factory botom end of the 6A13 and work from there.
User avatar
Valandis91
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Tasmania
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by Valandis91 »

but their engine was meant for NA so why would they go forged?

what would you need?

im thinking for myself: Custom Extractors, Custom pistons, Special Timing Belt,

would larger injectors be necessary?
what else?

also why does rpw say u need parts from 3 different engines?
Image
User avatar
Bennoz
National President
Posts: 23668
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by Bennoz »

I reckon it would be easy do-able, but I dont reckon you'd need anything fancy.

These are the main differences between the 6A13 & 6A12:
* The 6A13 bore & stroke is larger than 6A12. The 6A13 is an 81mm bore x 80.8mm stroke, while the 6A12 is an 78.4mm bore x 69.0mm stroke.
* The 6A13 has a much larger stroke crank which would go hand in hand with longer rods, as you can see by the big difference in stoke figures above, Plus all Mitsubishi factory turbo engines had the cranks nitrided (heat treated for strength.)
* The 6A13 had all the oil & water galleries in the block for the turbos tapped & drilled. These galleries come off the block & are present on the 6A12, but they are not drilled & tepped. They are just cast in.
* The 6A13 also has a larger capacity oil pump.

Now, the things we know will fit:
* 6A12 heads will bolt to the block - they have the same stud patterns
* The standard 6A12 Mivec timing assembly will fit on if - you change over the crank timing belt pulley from the 6A12 to the 6A13 crank and - you do not alter the deck heights of either the block or head (ie no major decking / machining of either.)

So, that gives us:
* 6A13 block (81mm bore)
* 6A13 crank and rods (80.8mm stroke)
* 6A12 heads, cams & timing assembly

What are we missing from that list? - Pistons.
The 6A13's lower compression ratio is governed by a combination of the 'dished style' top of the piston, the piston deck height (ie, the top surface of the piston relative in distance to the gudgeon or connecting pin to the rod) and head chamber design. These are the 2 things you'd need to look at carefully when bolting it all together. We'd need to source a 81mm diametre piston with the correct deck height, plus we'd need to match the combustion chamber size to the larger bore. Remebmer, the 6A12 heads are expecting to meet a 78mm piston, not an 81mm piston.

By piston deck height, this is what I mean:
The lower that distance is, the lower the compression will be (6A13's pistons are lower, hence the lower compression & why we can't use 6A13 pistons)
The higher the distance is, the higher the compression will be (As we require a compression ration of 10:1 or even higher for this application.)

Image

Here are some piston top designs:
A 'dished piston' allows for a volume of air in the surface of the piston, as well as the combustion chamber volume. This larger total volume of the combined combustion area vs the stroke of the motor = lower compression. Example:
Image

A 'Flat top' piston does not have the dished area & as such has no extra volume to add to the combustion volume. Therefore comrpession will be higher. Example:
Image

Then there are other pistons such as 'hemi' pistons that actually go right up & almost mate with the combustion chamber face. These are obviously designed for motors that are much less of an interference fit. This example has machined sections out to allow for valve clearance:
Image

The Mivec pistons are closer to being a flat piston, with valve clearances machined into them. Also keep in mind those valve clearances will also alter the compression ratio as they allow for more volume of air into the combustion area. Ideally, what we need for this application, is simply a copy of the 6A12 piston, just bigger - ie 81mm in diametre.

Now everyone goes on & on & about 'custom pistons' - which I think is bullshit. I've built dozen of hybrid monster engines over the years & not once have I needed custom made pistons. My mini was bored out to 74mm, so we found a Japanese 74mm Omega piston from an old Suziki that fit, I also build a 2 litre Datsun z24 motor which was bored out & we managed to fit Holden red motor pistons. If you think about it, we have been building internal combustion engines of the same design for the last 100 years. I garauntee there will be an off the shelf piston out there that will fit.... and the only people that will be able to tell you what piston will fit, will be the crusty old guy with a beard thats been assembling motors for 40 years in the machine shop. Not the internet.

In order to check all these values out, the engine will need to be 'dry' assembled a number of times to determine the clearances. The other item to check during a dry assembly will be the valve clearances to the piston top. We may well have to scallop out valve area in the top of the piston as it will be an interference engine. Again, this is cheaked by a dry assembly (with cams in) & rotating the engine. They usually put a product called 'beraring blue' on the valve faces, which will leave a mark on the piston if they hit, telling us where to remove metal from the piston surface.

The last thing that will need to be checked is the combustion chamber size. Being a 6A12 head, the chamber diametre is 78.mm, yet the piston diametre will be 81mm, therefore the chamber size will need to be machined out to match. Thats no problem, however it will need to be done to all 6 chambers. Once thats done, all 6 chambers will need to be "cc'ed" - that means they turn the heads upside down & fill each chamber with fluid & measure the fluid volume. All chambers must match, so if one chamber contains less fluid than the others, then more metal will need to be removed for it to match. All 6 must match.

So there you go, that the machining & assembly part of the black. I'd say there'd be 2-3 grands worth of work there.

The rest of the Mivec ancillaries such as starer motors, alternator, AC compressors etc will all just bolt on. Even the standard exhaust will bolt on - you will however need to port it out slightly as the 6A13 exhaust ports are slightly larger. Personally I'd modify a set of 6A12 hurricane or RPW extractor to fit.

Lastly, this will need some sort of engine management to get the most out of it. Seeing as we're using Mivec, I'd keep the standard Mivec ECU, but just add a piggy back to get the fueling right. Haltech interceptor or similar. It should all wire up to an exisitng GPX / GPvR loom. At the end of the day, all labour, parts (including buying the 6A13 motor) gaskets, belts, fluids, clutch? tuning etc I reckon you'd be up for 8 grand. which I reckon is pretty good... Especially when rpw wanted over 10 grand just for the motor alone.
User avatar
I8A4RE
QLD Coordinator
Posts: 9594
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: BOOSTIN in front of you
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by I8A4RE »

THIS.... Can't fault it. Well done ben. You have obviously put some thought into it. ;)

There you go boys, what you waitng for.
CHRISTIANITY: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
User avatar
Bennoz
National President
Posts: 23668
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by Bennoz »

I think I've confused them :lol:
User avatar
aza013
NSW Coordinator
Posts: 9087
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: The Shire
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by aza013 »

I am still going to do this when I get the time and money :D
User avatar
Dan25
Mechanic
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by Dan25 »

Haha I understood it. Quite well enough to realise I'm not even going to consider it!
User avatar
Valandis91
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Tasmania
Contact:

Re: 6a13 non turbo block with 6a12 mivec heads

Post by Valandis91 »

ben this information is amazing.

the way youve put it seems quite simple.

WHY DIDNT U TELL ME WHEN I WAS PLANNING WHAT TO DO TO MINE, sigh...

would my cams benefit from the 6a13 block?

i might attempt this once my bottom end goes bust.
Image
Post Reply