Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

This forum is for technical discussions on anything that will make your car handle better or go faster.

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

Post Reply
User avatar
evoman
Grease Monkey
Posts: 315
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, NSW

Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by evoman »

A month or so ago I decided to stop reading all the various arguments for and against coilovers and to get some myself to see how good/bad/pointless they were for someone looking for a predominantly street based performance handling setup. (Also note that my other reasons were to get the ride stance I wanted and more easy camber adjustability for better spirited driving setups, so I wasn't one eyed)

As usual I read too much, thought too much and possibly even ended up making too much of the wrong decision, but I thought I would document my questions and experience below in case it is of any assistance to anyone.

Before reading below, its probably worth noting that I am a little particular with my handling, so my idea of things might be totally different to yours. I also have limited knowledge, so much of what I write might be utter crap, so digest at your own discretion.
For interests sake - my car has LSD, front and rear strut braces, a H brace, 20mm front and rear swaybars with new bushes, new nolethane control arm bushes (which removed a lot of understeer I had) and yet degrading all this I have 18" wheels with 35 profile tyres.

At the time of purchasing the coilovers I didn't really have the budget for the high end (and predominantly track spec) Tein and Cusco items, so I opted for the BC Racing BR Gold - as many others on here have. Based on all I had read and heard, these were the only budget coilovers worth buying.

From talking to people, reading and going for a spin in a few cars with coilovers, I decided that I really wanted to have mine a little softer than normal, because from what I could tell most of the out of the box coilover kits I read about and drove on were far too hardcore for Australian roads and more than anything degraded usable performance. Sure they might go ok on a track, but there has to be a nice compromise which can be achieved somewhere along the line.

The question was, how much lower spring rate should I choose and (assuming the BC damping was matched with much firmer spring rates ) would it have the range of adjustability and damping quality to cope with lower spring rates?

In the end, I opted for 4kg front/3kg rear, significantly less than the 7kg/5kg than BC Racing usually provides the FTO with.

Due to a booking fail, I had these installed at 10.30 the night before I needed to go to Albury so I didn't even get a chance to play around and test them. I had them set on about 3/4 hard (22 clicks) and the following morning set off on my way to Albury (not down the highway). Not knowing what to expect from coilovers, I was immediately pretty unhappy. They didn't feel terribly hard, but it was very bouncy, very skittish over bad sections of road and I felt EVERYTHING. My car had rattles and vibrations it never had before and just felt like a bitch. Was easily the worst 6 hour trip I have ever had. Yes I am a goose for not just stopping and changing the damper settigns, but I just wanted to get there ok lol.

Eventually, I had time to play around with the full range of damping available and drive repeatedly around the same long loop of road across different surfaces to see the difference each change made.

After much testing I tried to figure out why I still wasn't getting the results I wanted and came back across what I think is a great summary of damping.
The way you tell whether a system (such as a car's suspension) is under or overdamped (or "critically damped" which means the perfect amount of damping) is by looking at how it oscillates.

Damping absorbs and dissipates the energy put into the suspension (in the form of heat) to control oscillations. A damper resists movement and therefore controls the speed at which the suspension can move. For example you could move a shock absorber very slowly and not feel it but if you moved it quickly you would feel resistance to that movement. This is caused by the shock pushing oil through small holes in the shock...move slow and oil flows fine, move fast and there is resistance.

An underdamped suspension (e.g., if there were no shocks on the car) would oscillate up and down for many cycles before settling down. So if your car is still bobbing two or three oscillations after a bump it is a bit underdamped.

An overdamped suspension would have too much resistance to movement. This is a bad thing because a suspension needs to keep the wheels in contact with the ground at all times. If you have a very aggressive shock on a lightly sprung car and hit a bump, the shock will prevent the wheel from rebounding and coming back into contact with the ground...obviously a bad thing. Your car may not oscillate but it will be skipping over the pavement.

The idea is to achieve critical damping where the suspension is allowed to move to keep contact with the ground but stops any oscillations after the bumps. Critical damping is a function of both spring rates and damping rates so you have to match the shocks to the springs to get it right. In general the stiffer the spring the more damping is required.
After lots of testing, I think(I don't really have enough knowledge to say definitely) I can achieve something close to "critical damping" at about 5 clicks below full soft. This is also the setting that feels most settled and comfortable on normal roads. However, when you take a mate for a drive in your FTO and he describes it as comfortable, you know you have failed in your quest for a mildly aggressive performance setup.

This isn't to say I am totally unhappy with this current setup. I am now able to get the ride stance I want (even though I haven't lowered it properly yet, I will shortly), I have the camber adjustability without spring binding, all the while having a reasonable performance/comfort compromise.

The disheartening aspect of all this is that I spent $1200 + fitment on suspension which (when set to best alround settings) feels almost exactly the same as Tein Springs/KYB Shocks/Cusco Pillowmounts it replaced.
On current settings mentioned above (5 clicks below soft), the handling is still reasonable, but there is still the slight sponginess to the suspension feel when pushed hard - something I was hoping to move beyond.

This sponginess is replaced by responsiveness the harder I set the damping, however the actual real world handling deteriorates markedy as it becomes crazy bouncy and skittish. Even going around the block, a hard acceleration out of a corner with slight imperfections turned the car into a real handful skipping and then suddenly gripping and tugging the wheel hard.

I suspect that by going down so far with the spring rates, I have made my suspension too easily "over damped". I suspect anything over about halfway hardness results in virtually riding on the shock, which I can't imagine being a good thing.
I'm not sure what it would like being in an overdamped car on a track. On smooth roads the hard damping settings feel reasonably good, but I guess it could be seriously degrading shock life?

So I am left with the dilemma as to whether I should leave it as is and just be happy with the all round compromise I have, or go another 1 - 1.5 kg higher in the spring rates to see if there is a happy medium which can be struck on the BC's.
Ideally, I would like to bump the "critical damping" level up to somewhere around the middle of the damping range (15-20 clicks) so that it could be nice and responsive, yet not overly harsh and skittish on normal roads.
However, I don't know if merely increasing the spring rate a bit more will achieve this or keep things predominantly the same, just firmer.
Would appreciate input or suggestions on this as I'm not really sure.

My uneducated conclusion is this;
- Don't drop your spring rates too far below recommend settings for the damper.
- Depending on how hard/soft your coilovers are, similar handling characteristics can be achieved with a good shock/spring combo. Just because you have coilovers doesn't instantly mean your car handles better than one which doesn't. As long as the spring and shock compliment each other and the car you will have good handling.
- Don't buy coilovers if you think they will magically turn your car into a handling masterpiece. There are many variables (road conditions being one) which affect how they will perform. If they are over damped, they will suck, if they are over sprung, they will suck. If you drive on crap roads like Parra road all the time, they will still suck as they are not Camry spec.
- Wanting to set your own ride height/stance, needing wheel clearance, wanting more camber adjustability (without dicking around with camber pins), wanting to track your car a lot, are all valid reason for coilovers. Up to you if you think that is worth $1300+
User avatar
Bennoz
National President
Posts: 23668
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by Bennoz »

Where did you get them from?

No suspsension sales place should be dropping the spring rate that far down without adjusting the valving in the shock to match - those little plates with holes in them that allow the oil to move between sections.

When I sent my Teins up to Fulcrum to have them retune to 'Aus spec' that exactly what they do. Drop the spring rates & put larger valves in (allowing more oil to flow with the softer spring.)

Dunno if I'd get them resprung, I'd get them revalved.
User avatar
DaveO
Grease Monkey
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 6:00 pm
Location: Geelong
Contact:

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by DaveO »

Also those 18" x 35 series tyers are contributing to the skipping your feeling. I just changed my 18" to 17" x 45 series and all the skipping has stoped. handles much better now. and i have coilovers as well.
8)
going fast doesn't kill you, it's the sudden stop that does.
User avatar
zuihoujueding
Oldtimer
Posts: 1980
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by zuihoujueding »

just a thought.
does stiffening the rear springs (im having kyb shocks+king springs) improve front end grip?
User avatar
evoman
Grease Monkey
Posts: 315
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, NSW

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by evoman »

Bennoz wrote:Where did you get them from?

No suspsension sales place should be dropping the spring rate that far down without adjusting the valving in the shock to match - those little plates with holes in them that allow the oil to move between sections.

When I sent my Teins up to Fulcrum to have them retune to 'Aus spec' that exactly what they do. Drop the spring rates & put larger valves in (allowing more oil to flow with the softer spring.)

Dunno if I'd get them resprung, I'd get them revalved.
Sigh. Yeah. I got them from JustJap.
I did say to them that I had heard it was not recommend to drop spring rates much below normal rates, but their reply was merely that they could order in the BC's with whatever spring rate you want. I obviously should have investigated further.

I did think though that the damper adjustability would have a certain operating range to it.
I guess my spastically worded question floating around in my head is something like this.
How does a damper with larger valves, set stiffer, differ from a damper with smaller valves set softer?...if you know what I'm trying to say.

At the moment, set on a soft damping setting they feel fine, but just not as responsive as I wanted.
User avatar
Bennoz
National President
Posts: 23668
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by Bennoz »

Come round & take my car for a drive & I'll show you.

The difference between zero clicks (softest) and 16 clicks is quite extreme.
User avatar
evoman
Grease Monkey
Posts: 315
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, NSW

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by evoman »

Did you say something about going for a spin in your car?
Ok, sweet, I'll see you tonight then lol.

Wouldn't mind you seeing what mine is like as well to see what you think.
User avatar
Bennoz
National President
Posts: 23668
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by Bennoz »

lol no worries. Im home all day today.
User avatar
SG
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 833
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Perth

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by SG »

zuihoujueding wrote:just a thought.
does stiffening the rear springs (im having kyb shocks+king springs) improve front end grip?
It does but it also makes the back end more willing to turn around.

Another plus is that the front end lifts less if you go drag racing so you might get a better time.

I think if i had to choose coilover rates again i would go 4kg front and rear and leave a smaller rear arb on, instead of 5/4... i think its about right for roads around my area... although some of em are rediculous...
User avatar
zuihoujueding
Oldtimer
Posts: 1980
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by zuihoujueding »

i thought fwd needs thicker rear arb, at least according to whiteline.
User avatar
SG
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 833
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Perth

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by SG »

It does but stiffening rear springs has the same effect, so it would double the overall effect.
User avatar
zuihoujueding
Oldtimer
Posts: 1980
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by zuihoujueding »

really, how can stiffening rear springs works the same as thicker arb?

by the way, how to stiffen existing springs? i've seen some kind of spacers in between the springs to decrease the travel, but not sure thats call stiffening?
User avatar
SG
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 833
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Perth

Re: Suspension/coilover thoughts and questions.

Post by SG »

I think the easiest way to stiffen springs is to trade them for stiffer ones already made. They're $150 or something for two(?) from a suspension shop.

I don't really know the technical details but its to do with stopping body roll or weight transfer on that end of the car. A rear ARB will keep the outside rear more stiff and so does stiffer springs and also raising the rear height. But thye all have drawbacks. I would have thought stiffer springs has more benefit than a big rear arb because its less likely to lift an inside wheel and has less front lift, but the chances of turning around are increased by a bit so i guess its less safe.
Post Reply