FTO AUSTRALIA

Ok, put it this way, you can make the most aerodynamic vehicle possible.. but regardless of anything, it still needs an equivalent engine to utilise its potential..

And the same goes vice-versa.

Dont worry daniel! i know what you're on about lol

Hold on. Daniel. I'm confused. All these cars your mentioning are pistons. Let me explain

Rotor>Piston.

Kustom wrote:Hold on. Daniel. I'm confused. All these cars your mentioning are pistons. Let me explain

Rotor>Piston.

Dont worry mate, as soon as funds allow then I'll be onto an eggbeater as a track/weekender

Sahin wrote:Dont worry daniel! i know what you're on about lol

Cant tell if trolling or serious

Kustom wrote:Hold on. Daniel. I'm confused. All these cars your mentioning are pistons. Let me explain

Rotor>Piston.

We know you like to spin Kustom.
The rest of us prefer the stroke.

Sorry.... You could strap that thing to a shoe box and I'd take it over a Veyron. Why you may ask??? Because it's a Rotary. Bit like the Ford vs Holden argument. People stop thinking logically when they're defending something they love. Although that kind of horsepower in a topfuel / funnycar configuration would give the V8 boys something to think of. Last time I checked there were Rotaries in the 6 sec bracket with under 1000 horsepower. Double that and sh*t gets interesting. Anyways I'm rambling. Insomnia has reared its ugly head.