Page 31 of 58

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:24 pm
by bjk
I don't mean like 4/3, just 1kg down to 6/4 like Bennoz suggested. Chill the f**k out man. :lol:

I've explained this before, I'm just well researched, haha. Kiz is selling his extractors? Why for?

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:31 pm
by Vectose
Better to research and get it right the first time than impulse buy then sell/replace when it isn't what you wanted. Within reason. :lol:

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:35 pm
by destinationtoby
Vectose wrote:Better to research and get it right the first time than impulse but then sell/replace when it isn't what you wanted. Within reason. :lol:

Yeah like me :horse: :troll:

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:30 pm
by c3rbera
bjk wrote:I don't mean like 4/3, just 1kg down to 6/4 like Bennoz suggested. Chill the f**k out man. :lol:

I've explained this before, I'm just well researched, haha. Kiz is selling his extractors? Why for?
Haha well if he ever goes turbo (likely), manifolds in, extractors out. 9+ months away but it's looking like a reality.








.... eye dibbsed zem... :(D):

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:41 pm
by vipfto
Yeah as will prob model off manifolds much cheaper to remove mine then just copy than fab new from scratch

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:51 pm
by bjk
True dat. You can have 'em Rubes. ;) By that time I might have my own things in motion.

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:54 pm
by silverGPX
I wished I lived at home with my parents

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:56 pm
by bjk
Do you? I don't. :lol: I see them every week anyways.

What's the relevance, meanwhile?

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:59 pm
by Daniel2019
bjk wrote:What's the relevance, meanwhile?
You aren't used to random BS gibberish yet? :lol:

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 10:00 pm
by c3rbera
bjk wrote:True dat. You can have 'em Rubes. ;) By that time I might have my own things in motion.
:twisted: Awh yeah.
Makes me wonder what those plans are...any sharing?
silverGPX wrote:I wished I lived at home with my parents
Out of the blue..?

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:30 am
by bjk
c3rbera wrote:
bjk wrote:True dat. You can have 'em Rubes. ;) By that time I might have my own things in motion.
:twisted: Awh yeah.
Makes me wonder what those plans are...any sharing?
Mebbe. ;) We'll see, haha.

Got me an alignment today, and some cam-bears on the rear. Tim's bolts weren't up to his satisfaction, so none on the front. As explained, scrub is rampant. I can feel the new wheels and tyres have a lot more potential, but I can't utilise it effectively. Next stop: coilovers, haha. And as usual, pics. A smaller amount this time. :roll: :lol:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 3:11 am
by vanadinite
Astron_Boy wrote:
vanadinite wrote:F*#k all this talk about spring rates, its all BS nonsense. Standard BC's have enough flexibility be nice and soft for the street and rock hard for track. The preset spring rates are perfect for the FTO.
If you get softer spring rates your defeating the purpose of coilovers, you may as well go get some big king springs and chop them to size like a commofag.
Relax, he's just in to making his e-peen bigger.
First wheels, then tyres, now spring rates.
Next thing will be sway bars, then urethane bushes and so on.
I dont know how much more I can take :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
bjk wrote:I don't mean like 4/3, just 1kg down to 6/4 like Bennoz suggested. Chill the f**k out man. :lol:

I've explained this before, I'm just well researched, haha. Kiz is selling his extractors? Why for?
Your far from well researched, your so detailed and Nitpicky it borders on autistic. :lol: :lol:

Jokes, its looking great mate but for heavens sake just buy standard BR's Lol.

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:08 am
by bjk
You can call me the anti-Toby. :lol: I am a balancing force in the FTOAus universe.

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:41 am
by Shane001
bjk wrote:Image
I like the look with that tyre size actually and the height is about perfect, looks tough!

Have you rolled the guards? If not do this as this may be all you need. Coilovers with stiffer springs would be a good idea though.

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:11 am
by bjk
Yeah, guards rolled flat and it's still a b*tch, haha. Hate to imagine what it would've been like without. Likely would've shredded a tyre. I can already see (only really on the left front) a numbers of lines from where it's bounced against the fender. This is the cost of cheaper tyres. :lol:

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:21 am
by Astron_Boy
Car does look good with that stance.
Especially with the roof up.

I personally don't think it needs anything else, looks good as is.

Looks a bit tall at the bum, but ehh...

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:25 am
by Shane001
bjk wrote:Yeah, guards rolled flat and it's still a b*tch, haha. Hate to imagine what it would've been like without. Likely would've shredded a tyre. I can already see (only really on the left front) a numbers of lines from where it's bounced against the fender. This is the cost of cheaper tyres. :lol:
Yeah so you definitely need coilovers with stiffer springs. Keep the ride height as is though I reckon, looks good.

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:34 am
by bjk
I also think the rear tends to look a bit high, but the actual difference is stuff all between front and back. (like 5mm tops.)

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:51 am
by Shane001
Personally I think it looks better with a little rake. Not a big fan of the 'drop the arse' look lol.

Re: BJK's '95 GPX

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:58 am
by destinationtoby
bjk wrote:You can call me the anti-Toby. :lol: I am a balancing force in the FTOAus universe.
hey dont use me as an escape route motherfuker :P